FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • The new game has come, and there's a lot of editing that needs to be done, some of which needs admin permissions (changing the main page, top bar, etc...).

    Is any of you old admins still active?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello there! I'm SoakThePirate, and I came back after a year or so of not editing this wiki. I see that it requires more than a bit of tune-up in areas like Categories, Wikia Badges, levels in older Gemcraft games(and newer too)... If I can ask for one favor... Can you promote me(not neccesarily to Administrator) so I can create new Categories, clear some pages of spam and unneccesary info, and edit Badges?

    I'm just asking, I know that it won't happen but I'll try to edit this Wikia anyway.

    Have a nice day, cheers!

      Loading editor
    • > I see that it requires more than a bit of tune-up [...]

      Understatement of the century.

      Good luck with getting privileges, this place sure needs more editors.

        Loading editor
    • Lel. xD

      I'll edit this wiki anyway, even if I won't get those privileges. :D

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • There doesn't seem to be any kind of active forum or Community Portal (at least not that I've found), so I decided to come to you as the only currently active administrator. As you've probably noticed, I had a bot create pages for each of the original GCCS fields. Now, the Steam version has come out, and there are a number of differences. On pretty much every hextile, there are at least one or two fields that are different between the original game and the Steam version. Sometimes, the differences are minor (e.g., an extra wall), but sometimes not so much (e.g., different buildings, monster stats, and field drops all on the same level), plus there are a number of entirely new levels for the Steam version.

    Right now, I'm leaning towards creating an entirely new set of field pages for Steam, even when they're identical to the original, for the simple reason that they may not stay that way. Plus there would need to be a new field list page for them as well, probably with a cross-link on each from one to the other. I'm not sure we'd need the cross-links on the field pages themselves, though. Any thoughts on any of this from you (or anyone else who reads this)?

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • 1) I'd like "Original" better, but it also depend what the Kong version will have. If, as I suspect, it's a copy of the AG version I am for using a word like "Web version" or "Browser".

      2) IMHO the best is having it 3 gems wide, like the in-game ui. Why we cannot use the same skin as Wikipedia (as other wiki do) which is familiar to everyone and wastes 0 space is beyond me. Maybe at least offer it as an alternative.

        Loading editor
      1. Okay, I'll set it to Original for now; when the Kongregate version comes out, we can re-evaluate.
      2. I'd considered that, but that'll make the table awfully tall, I suspect, since rows could be up to three gems high. This would be especially noticeable for those of us who use Monobook, where it's always 1-gem high on a decently wide screen. Plus, it wouldn't really match the in-game UI anyway, at least not without some work, because the gems would still be listed all in a row, not in the same positions as in-game.
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello Koopa troopa!  I am LevenThumps, and helped start up this wiki.  Due to college and other life events, I have been unable to monitor this wiki as much as I would like.  I have seen your edits since you joined this wiki, and been very impressed with them.  Because of this, I would like to promote you to an administrator.  I'm going to try to help monitor the wiki more often, but if I am unable to, you are capable of it now.

    Thanks for all your hard work!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, welcome to Gemcraft Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the File:Capture21.png page.

    Please leave me a message if I can help with anything!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.